**The approval step stops being folklore.** Each delivery's page starts showing exactly how the
editor of record approves or rejects an item — with that delivery's REAL identifiers, not an
example with invented names the editor would have to translate before using, which is where
identifiers get mistyped. The item suggested for approval is the one with the most claims whose
excerpt is in the bytes; the one suggested for rejection has none.

**A new skill: `/newsroom-entregas`.** The review session for a delivery, written for the
editor: receive the file without touching it, freeze what it names, check every excerpt, and
decide item by item. It also says what to do when a source is not readable but should be — the
Diário da República PDF route — and why a 403 is not worked around.

**A rule that was in the gate and written nowhere the editor would read it:** you do not approve
an item whose claims are all without a readable source. Approving means "this may be written as
fact", and in that case there are no bytes to hold it up. The route is to open a research issue,
not to lower the bar.